The Fury faltered only in Crysis 3, where its 1440p minimum of 34fps couldn’t match the 38fps of the GTX 980. Here the Fury stormed through at 130fps, which was 25fps beyond anything the GTX 980 could manage. The gap was even wider in Batman: Arkham Origins. This is spot on for perfect playability and five frames quicker than the GTX 980. In Battlefield 4 at 1440p, the Fury averaged 60fps. The gap between AMD and Nvidia was highlighted in 3DMark: in the Extreme benchmark, the Fury’s score of 6,697 points easily beat the 5,620 points scored by the GTX 980. Even then, the Radeon’s result of 85fps was only one frame behind the Nvidia card and still easily playable.
The Radeon beat its rival in almost every test it fell behind only in Battlefield 4.
AMD RADEON R9 FURY X 1080P
The Fury’s 1080p benchmarks also established an early lead over Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 980. Even its poorest frame rate of 82fps in Crysis 3 is still excellent.
Its best score was in Batman: Arkham Origins, where it topped out at 200fps. It blitzed through the majority of my test games with average frame rates beyond 100fps. AMD Radeon R9 Fury – Results AnalysisĪMD’s latest card left our 1080p benchmarks in the dust. It has a tempting specification of its own: a 1,126MHz core clock that boosts to 1,266MHz, 4GB of 7,010MHz GDDR5 memory and 2,048 stream processors. The Fury’s main competition is the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980, whose prices start at £384. The Fury is clocked to a cool 1,000MHz, but its bigger brother runs at 1,050MHz. The cheaper card has 3,584 stream processors divided into 224 texture units, as opposed to the 4,096 stream processors of the flagship model. There are only a couple of differences between the Fury and the Fury X. That makes up for a lack of speed in the chips themselves – the Fury’s 4GB of memory runs at 500MHz, which is slower than any other high-end GPU. The High Bandwidth Memory inside the Fury has a monstrous 4,096-bit interface, which is eight times as wide as the 512-bit bus used on older cards. This replaces the GDDR5 found on older cards and uses a far wider interface. The most noticeable new component, though, is High Bandwidth Memory. Underpinning it all is the Fiji core, which uses the familiar Graphics Core Next architecture with turbo-charged components and more hardware in virtually every department.įor instance, each shader engine now has 16 stream processors rather than the 11 included in older cards. The Radeon R9 Fury isn’t a flagship in the same way as the Fury X, but it shares much of the same hardware. Crucially, though, the Fury is significantly cheaper than AMD’s current flagship model. There isn’t much that differentiates the Fury and the Fury X when it comes to the underlying hardware. The most recent to emerge is the Radeon R9 Fury, which sits between the flagship Fury X and the tiny Fury Nano. AMD promised a handful of cards with the Fury name at the top of its latest graphics range.
0 kommentar(er)
